What
is your vision of the world you want to live in?
How can we can make this vision a reality?
JB from Reclaim
the Streets
mk->> So, I'd like to ask you, what
kind of world are you fighting for? And then, we can maybe talk
about what kind of practical tactics or protests, in terms of
the actions you've been involved in, you think have worked well
toward moving towards that kind of world.
JB->> Well, for me I think it's about diversity.
I think what really inspires me about new social movements, I
kind of look at it as an ecological model. Harry Cleaver uses
this kind of water model as well, which I think is very inspiring.
What is an ecology? Well, an ecological system works because
of its diversity, it's destroyed by monoculture. We look at the
new social movements and the way that they're networking, and
enormous diversity. Yesterday [J18] was a classic example, Bangladeshi
garment workers, Autonomous Astronauts, anarchists, feminists,
Nigerians. Yeah, so the diversity, like an ecosystem. The other
thing about ecosystems is the fact that they're incredibly locally
specific, but globally connected. So, a certain shrub that is
in the savanna, you take it to England it's gonna die, yet it's
connected because of weather and so on. And again I think these
movements work best locally, but yet have this connection. So
that ecological model I find very strong. The idea of an ecology
on the edges, where different ecological systems overlap, where
the greatest creativity happens in an ecosystem, where more evolution
happens fastest. And again, I think where these social movements
overlap, like when the Dockers started working with us, then
that's where things really begin to move. So for me, that ecological
model as a process is really important. I don't have a vision
of the world I want to live in, beyond knowing that it's a world
of mutual aid and ecologically free. It's a slogan really. I
don't think I have a specific vision of the world that I want
to live in. But I know that it's gonna be a diverse one. I'm
not interested in any social movements that try and create one
way of thinking, that try and create one text, one way of life,
one world, one vision of one world. I think there will be many
worlds. But it's certainly a world where money will be abolished,
it's certainly a world where we'll return to a sense of locality
and community and ecological sustainability. I think it's very
difficult to imagine that world when we're living in this one.
We'll imagine it through the process of destroying this one.
But, my dream is that in the next five years I really want to
try and think about how do we create practical alternatives in
the moments of struggle? I mean that is the model, it's really,
how do you that? Even if they have a certain symbolism. Yesterday,
what would've been fantastic was to get into the London International
Futures Exchange and dig it up and occupy it and turn it into
a permaculture garden. To try and present an alternate type of
model, so that when they say, "They wrecked the Futures
Exchange," they couldn't say that.
mp->> They couldn't stop there, right.
JB->> "And created this." Even if it's
just symbolic at that level. In a sense even Claremont Road,
OK, it was there for six months, it's still really symbolic.
We didn't create a sustainable living community. But for six
months there was a free autonomous space, self-policed, where
they had a certain economy, very unstructured, but you know,
it created, again, for me, one of the important things is how
do you create spaces of freedom? How do you create spaces where
people are free to participate, are free to bring their own creative
energies into it? And June the 18th was a classic example yesterday,
and a street party always is that. It always amazes me how people
will be working up to something and bring something on the day.
They're not involved in the movement, they're not organizers
or anything, but they'll be on their own and they know that here's
a free space where anything can happen. And Claremont Road was
like that for six months. I'm waffling.
mp->> No, you've made the point definitely.
mk->> Yeah, you're talking about the tactics that
you think have worked towards that.
mp->> And that is when you can actually create the
world you want in the same moment that you're opposing the existing
one.
JB->> And the trees, at the M41, it's become a kind
of iconic image. They had these big carnivalesque figures, women
with big skirts. And under the skirts people were drilling holes
in the tarmac, and planting trees. That's extraordinary, because
you've got the carnival, but you've got the alternatives: a motorway,
with trees in it! Says it all. It's symbolic, but I think we're
working on those levels anyway. I mean, yesterday, J18, that
was symbolic. We didn't affect the shares, the stock market went
up yesterday thirty-four points. I think we cost them a lot of
money, and I think it'll be interesting to see the level of work
that went on. I'm sure the market would have gone higher on a
normal day. I'm sure it did have an effect, but pretty minuscule.
You know, you could be very critical. I was thinking of writing
an article on how GDP is increased through protest. Through that
level of protest, through destructive, so-called criminal damage,
which I'm not against at all. But it's interesting that GDP will
go up. We've done big business. The glaziers, gonna have a lovely
time. On a deep ecology level you could be very critical. We're
using more resources to mend this stuff.
mp->> And also that the people who have to clean
up the mess are the people on the shit end of the stick anyway.
JB->> Absolutely.
|